Being part of a relationship should offer all the
advantages of singleness, but with the added _option_ of the benefits made
possible by synergy when more than one party come together to pool their
strengths. This is because efficiency and non-duplication of effort and the
usage of resources are then seen in the areas where one or the other happens to
have a higher competency in.
Ergo, savings should be gained in the use of
effort, and other resources.
An 'option' cannot take on a negative value as
holding the possibility, but not the obligation, to engage in something cannot
be worth less than zero.
In effect, the above model implies that the best of
both worlds can be achieved. In other words, one (both, actually) can have their
cake and eat it too.
However: there is an important condition that is
required for the model to work:
In other words, mathematically, as the holder of an
option, the value of being in a relationship should not be less than the value
of being single provided the below assumption is met:
- That neither party oblige each other to do
things that they are not willing to do. In other words, before entering into the
transaction - they must ensure that they are mutually satisfied with the terms
of the other party as presented to them at this initial stage - and expect
them as unlikely to change substantially over the course of time, as are written
terms in a contract in any regular business agreement.
In those aspects that the other party has assumed no obligation to comply with, the first party should 'take care of themself' i.e. handle those aspects similar to
what they would do had they remained single.
In which, this situation is no worse off than being
single.
However -- in the areas that one of the parties has
a competitive advantage in and henceforth agreed to take responsibility for, the
handling of this area by the said superior party would bring mutual benefit to
both parties, this is what constitutes the value of entering into such an
agreement.
Take note that the validity of the above model
hinges totally on this single condition.
Chinese Dictionary S...
Wow.. will download and try! XD
First Steps after in...
re: XAMPP vs. WAMP - I am not sure ...
MySQL database Chara...
Just to add to the article - to those...
First Steps after in...
XAMPP vs. WAMP - Thanks for sharing t...
MySQL database Chara...
Not only Joomla, everything else sho...