|
This question lovingly directed to all Sarawakian
readers:
|
Q. Who was the first Chief Minister of
Sarawak?
|
Does any Sarawakian
know?
Especially to my Sarawakian friends, they could ask
their other friends, and out of 10, count how many can answer this... if at
all... correctly.
Not being sarcastic, but there's a reason behind
it (read to the end of the article to find out.)
First of all, though, maybe you're wondering why do I have this question
today?
Triggered by this first thought:
I wonder how much is the current petrol price in Brunei.
In the
recent environment of rising world petrol prices for the past two years or so, I
wonder how was Brunei affected all along?
Well, back to the main topic, there's no blame if no one ever remembers his
name...
what I'm fuming about is...
selective inclusion in our history syllabus
Like I would remember (or even know) who was the first mayor of
Kuala Lumpur. And in fact I do -- and without the benefit of a Google Search. he is
Dato' Lokman, none other than the one with a school named after
him.
Anyway, Sarawak is almost like a nation unto
itself, so knowing who the hell was the first Chief Minister seems to be a whole
lot more important than knowing or not knowing who the first Lord Mayor of KL
was.
I wonder though, whether there were any schools
named after him - to know why, read on...
Original article here, but copied below just in case
it gets taken down, as it might be perceived, due to its emphasis on a certain
episode, to have a mite of strong biasness:
I wonder how much competition would an independent Sarawak or Sabah, in 50 years, have provided the Peninsular - provided that their leaders didn't go down the same path of unaccountably managing (i.e. squandering without any transparency) the country's resources. It is always a wonder to me why countries with no natural resources such as Japan or Switzerland manage to get to their level of technical advancement. Don't give me that they started earlier - we had 50 years - and coupled with the benefit of not needing to reinvent the wheel for many technologies - i.e. we didn't even need to have to come up with any new technologies like Japan or Switzerland had to - In any case, with our rich natural resources we could just have purchased up to a certain level and continue to develop from there rather than needing to start from scratch. And we didn't have two atomic bombs dropped on any of our cities, either.
Would they (Sabah and Sarawak) be another two Singapores? Or just ... two more Malaysias?
Anyway :-
Ningkan, Stephen Kalong
(1920–1997), first chief minister of the East Malaysian state of Sarawak.
Stephen Kalong Ningkan served as first chief minister of the East Malaysian
state of Sarawak between July 1963 and September 1966. Prior to Sarawak's
joining the union of Malaya, Singapore, and North Borneo to form the Federation
of Malaysia, Sarawak was a British colony. Born in Sarawak of Iban and Chinese
ancestry, Ningkan is probably best known for triggering a constitutional crisis
when he refused to vacate his office after being dismissed by the Sarawakian
governor. Ningkan, as leader of the Council Negri (the state legislature), had
purportedly ceased to command the confidence of the majority of the council.
With the backing of the federal government in Kuala Lumpur, the governor
proceeded to appoint a new chief minister. Ningkan's refusal to vacate his
office, resulting in a constitutional impasse that was perceived to threaten the
fragile unity of Malaysia, aroused a vigorous reaction from the federal
government.
On 14 September 1966, Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Malaysia's head of state,
proclaimed a state of emergency in Sarawak on the basis that its
security
was threatened by the constitutional crisis. Under emergency rule, Parliament
was legislatively enabled to exercise further powers, effectively governing
Sarawak from the federal capital. Ningkan appealed his dismissal all the way to
the Privy Council in London, Malaysia's then final appellate court, but lost his
appeal for a declaration that he was still chief minister of Sarawak. A firm
believer that Sarawakians were entitled to have full citizenship rights and to
participate in Malaysia's national development on a par with the Malays on the
Malaya Peninsula, Ningkan slipped into political oblivion after his removal from
office.
The constitutional crisis that Ningkan was embroiled in should be seen in the
light of the volatile political matrix in Malaysia then. After Malaysia was
created through the union of Malaya and Singapore, Sabah, and Sarawak on 16
September 1963, communal tension rose over the core identity of Malaysia. The
politically convenient union was short-lived and Singapore left the federation
on 9 August 1965. At the federal level, there was concern that Sarawak and Sabah
might follow Singapore and secede from Malaysia. The removal of Ningkan, albeit
by constitutional means, was an attempt by the federal government in Kuala
Lumpur to exercise indirect control by aligning East Malaysian political parties
with the United Malays National Organization–dominated coalition at the
center.
Further Reading
Means, Gordon P. (1970) Malaysian Politics. London: University of
London Press.
Milne, Robert Stephen, and Kanagaratnam Jeya Ratnam. (1974) Malaysia—New
States in a New Nation: Political Development of Sarawak and Sabah in
Malaysia. London: Frank Cass.
Roff, Margaret Clark. (1974) The Politics of Belonging: Political Change
in Sabah and Sarawak. Kuala
Lumpur,
Malaysia: Oxford University Press.
Von Vorys, Karl. (1975) Democracy without Consensus: Communalism and
Political Stability in Malaysia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press.
|
|
Chinese Dictionary S...
Wow.. will download and try! XD
First Steps after in...
re: XAMPP vs. WAMP - I am not sure ...
MySQL database Chara...
Just to add to the article - to those...
First Steps after in...
XAMPP vs. WAMP - Thanks for sharing t...
MySQL database Chara...
Not only Joomla, everything else sho...